Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Msn4p YDR258C PubMed external link Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 N/A
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Stress Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Stress Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) N/A
PubMed external link Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress 10 min shift to pH=8 N/A
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6(): Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD 30.C N/A