Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Download     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Msn4p YDR453C PubMed external link Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD + 0,5M NaCl N/A
PubMed external link Hong SK et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17Hong SK et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Carbon source quality/availability double Δmsn2,3 mutant; post-diauxic shift N/A
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Stress Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min N/A
PubMed external link Wong CM et al., Free radical biology & medicine, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97Wong CM et al., Free radical biology & medicine, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress Oxidative stress, Exponential-phase cells cultivated in SC medium supplemented with 0.5 mM H2O2 N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Stress Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate) N/A
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress) N/A
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2 N/A
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 N/A
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Carbon source quality/availability Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) N/A
PubMed external link Weiner A et al., PLoS biology, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS biology, 2012;10(7):e1001369 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress Diamide exposure-90min N/A