PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression
Positive
N/A
Carbon source quality/availability
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
N/A
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77
Indirect
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
BY4741; S288C; R1158
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.
0.51197182221927
PubMed
Chow J et al., Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2018 Aug 9;4(3):Chow J et al., Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2018 Aug 9;4(3):
Indirect
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant
Negative
YS58
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
wt and ECM22 overexpressing strain were grown at 30.C in YPD medium