Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Group |
Environmental Condition |
Log2FC |
|
Msn2p
|
YFL014W
|
PubMed
Martínez-Pastor MT et al., The EMBO journal, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35Martínez-Pastor MT et al., The EMBO journal, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
7% ethanol 20min |
N/A |
PubMed
Schmitt AP et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
N/A |
PubMed
Smith A et al., The EMBO journal, 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3556-64Smith A et al., The EMBO journal, 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3556-64 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Treger JM et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998 Oct 9;273(41):26875-9Treger JM et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998 Oct 9;273(41):26875-9 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
JT659 |
Stress |
Heat-shock treatment |
N/A |
PubMed
McBride HJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1999 Jul 23;274(30):21029-36McBride HJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1999 Jul 23;274(30):21029-36 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
0,7M NaCl 60min |
N/A |
PubMed
Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-A |
Stress |
Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C |
N/A |
PubMed
Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 |
N/A |
PubMed
Amorós M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32Amorós M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Carbon source quality/availability |
Carbon source starvation |
N/A |
| Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
Heat shock |
N/A |
| Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
Osmotic stress |
N/A |
| Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
oxidative stress |
N/A |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Stress |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
N/A |
| Indirect |
2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant) |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Stress |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
N/A |
PubMed
Kandror O et al., Molecular cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81Kandror O et al., Molecular cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
PubMed
Lai LC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Oxygen availability |
SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (2 generations) |
N/A |
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
N/A |
Carbon source quality/availability |
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h |
N/A |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Stress |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
N/A |
PubMed
Erkina TY et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2008 Feb;28(4):1207-17Erkina TY et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2008 Feb;28(4):1207-17 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Melamed D et al., RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2008 Jul;14(7):1337-51Melamed D et al., RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2008 Jul;14(7):1337-51 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
Osmotic stress; Exponential phase cells cultivated in YPD growth medium supplemented with1 M NaCl |
N/A |
PubMed
Berry DB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min |
N/A |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
N/A |
PubMed
Ni L et al., Genes & development, 2009 Jun 1;23(11):1351-63Ni L et al., Genes & development, 2009 Jun 1;23(11):1351-63 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Stress |
SD medium + NaCl 0,6M 30' |
N/A |
PubMed
Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 |
N/A |
PubMed
Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
N/A |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Complex industrial media |
Sake mash on day 5 |
N/A |
PubMed
Kim HS et al., Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2011 Aug;91(4):1159-72Kim HS et al., Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2011 Aug;91(4):1159-72 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Stress |
YPD+10%ethanol, 30 min |
N/A |
PubMed
Sadeh A et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38Sadeh A et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Huebert DJ et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53Huebert DJ et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Stress |
H2O2 treatment |
N/A |
PubMed
Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Current biology : CB, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45Stewart-Ornstein J et al., Current biology : CB, 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2336-45 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Stress |
Estradiol induced |
N/A |
PubMed
Elfving N et al., Nucleic acids research, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82Elfving N et al., Nucleic acids research, 2014 May;42(9):5468-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SD + glucose + estradiol induction |
N/A |
PubMed
Gutin J et al., Molecular systems biology, 2015 Oct 7;11(10):829Gutin J et al., Molecular systems biology, 2015 Oct 7;11(10):829 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
Log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Cho BR et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms, 2017 Jun;1860(6):695-704Cho BR et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta. Gene regulatory mechanisms, 2017 Jun;1860(6):695-704 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
1Â mM H2O2 |
N/A |
| Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Carbon source quality/availability |
2% lactic acid |
N/A |
| Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
2% glucose |
N/A |
PubMed
Rajvanshi PK et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18628-18643Rajvanshi PK et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2017 Nov 10;292(45):18628-18643 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Carbon source quality/availability |
2% or 6% glucose, stationary phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6(): |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY5764 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YPD 30.C |
N/A |
PubMed
Bai C et al., PloS one, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PloS one, 2020;15(8):e0237540 |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
N/A |
| Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
SP1 |
Stress |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
N/A |
| Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
N/A |
| Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Stress |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
N/A |
| Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant |
Positive |
SP1 |
Stress |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
N/A |
PubMed
Dai B et al., Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica, 2021 Dec 8;53(12):1723-1730Dai B et al., Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica, 2021 Dec 8;53(12):1723-1730 |
Indirect |
flow cytometry - GFP fluorescence |
Positive |
W303 |
Cell cycle/morphology |
exposed to different QSMs for 45 min (quorum-sensing molecule), Selective Complete medium (SC, -His) |
N/A |
PubMed
Jonas F et al., Nucleic acids research, 2023 Jun 9;51(10):4831-4844Jonas F et al., Nucleic acids research, 2023 Jun 9;51(10):4831-4844 |
Direct |
ChEC-seq |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SC medium |
N/A |
PubMed
Sweeney K et al., Cell reports, 2023 May 30;42(5):112426Sweeney K et al., Cell reports, 2023 May 30;42(5):112426 |
Indirect |
mCitrine reporter - wt vs TF light activation |
Positive |
S288C |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
LFM medium + light |
N/A |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., NPJ science of food, 2023 Jul 21;7(1):37Watanabe D et al., NPJ science of food, 2023 Jul 21;7(1):37 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF double mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Carbon source quality/availability |
YPD 20% glucose medium (fermentation stationary phase) |
N/A |