PubMed
Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77
Indirect
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
BY4741; S288C; R1158
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.
0.61893519655538
PubMed
Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
Yeast strains were grown in rich medium at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5.
-1.20595947620092
Indirect
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Negative
15Daub
Cell cycle/morphology
Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and immediately collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.