S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn2p	YMR173W	PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C	N/A
		PubMed Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	YPH98	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Horan S et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 2006 May;23(7):519-35	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1B	Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Berry DB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)	N/A
		PubMed Ni L et al., Genes & development, 2009 Jun 1;23(11):1351-63	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	SD medium + NaCl 0,6M 30'	N/A
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2	N/A
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)	N/A
			Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)	N/A
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	BY4741; S288C; R1158	Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.7446535276188
		PubMed Huebert DJ et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	H2O2 treatment	N/A
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	YPD 30.C	N/A