S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn2p	YNL194C	PubMed Puig S et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl	N/A
		PubMed Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	N/A	Carbon source quality/availability	Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)	N/A
		PubMed Huebert DJ et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2012 May;32(9):1645-53	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Stress	H2O2 treatment	N/A
		PubMed Hansen AS et al., Molecular systems biology, 2013 Nov 5;9():704	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	1-NM-PP1	N/A
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD 30.C	N/A
		PubMed Pfanzagl V et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2018 Nov 15;29(23):2848-2862	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD 30.C	N/A