Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Swi4p YOR372C PubMed external link Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Cell cycle/morphology alpha-factor treated cells N/A
Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Stress benomyl stress N/A
PubMed external link Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Horak CE et al., Genes & development, 2002 Dec 1;16(23):3017-33Horak CE et al., Genes & development, 2002 Dec 1;16(23):3017-33 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative N/A Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Cells grown in synthetic medium supplemented with 2% dextrose N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.27979429590912
PubMed external link Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778 Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Negative 15Daub Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Yeast strains were grown in rich medium at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. -0.652589848844905
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Negative 15Daub Cell cycle/morphology Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and immediately collected. Transcription factor gene deletion. -0.652589848844905
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium, 25.C N/A