Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Log2FC
Ume6p YPL160W PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.35060236175702
PubMed external link Lardenois A et al., Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2015 Oct;290(5):2031-46Lardenois A et al., Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2015 Oct;290(5):2031-46 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Grown in sporulation medium (SPII for 10 h) under standard conditions. Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.944153
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Grown in sporulation medium (SPII for 8 h) under standard conditions. Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.990245
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Grown in rich media with acetate (YPA) under standard conditions. Transcription factor gene deletion. 1.585476
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 YPD medium, 25.C N/A
PubMed external link Harris A et al., Genetics, 2023 Oct 4;225(2):Harris A et al., Genetics, 2023 Oct 4;225(2): Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Mitotic, 30min: Cells were in mitotic, log-phase growth. They were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 22.4 mg/L uracil, 80 mg/L tryptophan) for ~24 h to saturation, then back-diluted into fresh YPD to OD600 = 0.2 and grown ~3 h to log phase (OD600 ≥ 0.5). Once in log phase, β-estradiol (40 nM) was added, followed 30 min later by auxin (200 µM) at t=0min. Sampled at 30 min. 0.2126
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Under-expression Positive SK1 Mitotic, 15min: Cells were in mitotic, log-phase growth. They were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 22.4 mg/L uracil, 80 mg/L tryptophan) for ~24 h to saturation, then back-diluted into fresh YPD to OD600 = 0.2 and grown ~3 h to log phase (OD600 ≥ 0.5). Once in log phase, β-estradiol (40 nM) was added, followed 30 min later by auxin (200 µM) at t=0min. Sampled at 15 min. 0.148754
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Under-expression Positive SK1 Mitotic, 60min: Cells were in mitotic, log-phase growth. They were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 22.4 mg/L uracil, 80 mg/L tryptophan) for ~24 h to saturation, then back-diluted into fresh YPD to OD600 = 0.2 and grown ~3 h to log phase (OD600 ≥ 0.5). Once in log phase, β-estradiol (40 nM) was added, followed 30 min later by auxin (200 µM) at t=0min. Sampled at 60 min. 0.22789